Wiseside

EUDR quando la tracciabilità diventa un problema operativo

EUDR: when traceability becomes an operational challenge

If you work in procurement, quality assurance or supply chain management, the EUDR marks the point at which your supply chain traceability ceases to be something that can be reconstructed retrospectively and must instead be visible in real time.

And that changes everything.

Not just for those who import raw materials, but for anyone handling products containing cocoa, soya, palm oil, timber, coffee, rubber, cattle or derivatives.

So, the question is not: “Does this affect me?”

The question is: “Can I prove it, without difficulty?”

EUDR and supply chain traceability: what’s changing

EU Regulation 2023/1115 introduces a requirement: a product may only be placed on the EU market if

  • it is deforestation-free
  • it complies with the legislation of the country of origin
  • it is accompanied by a due diligence statement (DDS) or, for certain operators, by a simplified declaration

What is the point? The EUDR transforms traceability from an archive into an operational system.

To be compliant, it is not enough to simply receive data from suppliers.

Continuous, verifiable and shared supply chain traceability is required, capable of linking origin information with the entire subsequent history of the product.

For companies using these raw materials, this means being able to:

  • receive and retain EUDR data provided upstream, including origin and geolocation information
  • link this to incoming batches, internal processes and finished products
  • maintain consistent and up-to-date records throughout the entire supply chain
  • quickly retrieve documents, references and supply chain links in the event of audits or inspections

This is not merely a matter of document compliance.

It is operational compliance.

How to manage EUDR operational compliance

The implementation dates have been postponed under Regulation (EU) 2025/2650 (December 2025)

  • 30 December 2026 → medium and large enterprises
  • 30 June 2027 → micro and small enterprises

This means having more time, which is necessary to build a collaborative system.

What does this mean?

1. Map the supply chain and structure the data

Collect geographical coordinates, documents and information throughout the supply chain, using systems capable of automatically integrating them and making them available to all stakeholders.

2. Define governance and responsibilities

Establish who collects, who validates and who decides. Integrate compliance into business processes; do not manage it separately.

3. Involve suppliers

Without reliable upstream data, supply chain traceability breaks down. A shared data flow involving all stakeholders is required.

Who must take action? Responsibility and traceability along the supply chain

One of the key changes concerns the ‘first placer’, i.e. the party who first places the product on the EU market.

It is the first placer who must:

  • collect the data
  • assess the risk
  • submit the DDS

What about the other parties?

They do not need to resubmit the Declaration, but must retain a reference to the Due Diligence Statement already drawn up and ensure traceability and consistency of documentation

In short: responsibility is concentrated in one party, but supply chain traceability remains distributed.

Where does all this happen: TRACES and EUDR traceability

The DDS does not remain in your systems.

It must be recorded in the European information system based on the TRACES platform, where:

  • you register operators and declarations
  • you obtain a unique reference
  • you link the data to customs flows

This marks a fundamental shift: compliance becomes operational communication between businesses and institutions.

But this is where the problem arises.

TRACES does not solve traceability.

It puts it to the test.

If the data is not structured upstream, the European system becomes merely the final point where the problem surfaces.

iChain collaborative platform: how to manage the EUDR without disrupting operations

It is clear: the problem is not filling in the DDS.

It is arriving at that stage with data that is already prepared, consistent and verifiable.

In this context, collaborative supply chain platforms such as iChain enable you to:

  • collect data from suppliers via forms and APIs, with automatic checks
  • link raw materials, batches and finished products in a single digital chain
  • manage risk assessments with dashboards and tracked workflows
  • generate a DDS ready for TRACES and link it to shipments
  • share data with auditors, customers and partners without duplication

In practice, they shift the workload from:
manual collection and reconstruction → continuous and verifiable flow

And this is what makes compliance sustainable over time.

The EUDR is shattering an illusion

Supply chain traceability isn’t simply a database.

It’s an operational supply chain system.

If today:

  • you waste time trying to piece together what happened
  • expertise depends on key individuals
  • you manage fragmented data

you don’t have a regulatory problem.

You have a structural problem.

From traceability to operational compliance

Preparing for the EUDR does not mean adding another check.

It means building a system in which:

  • data is generated correctly
  • circulates among stakeholders
  • drives decisions
  • remains verifiable

In other words:
moving from data collection → traceability → operational compliance

Do you want to understand how to make EUDR compliance part of the operational workflow, without complicating it?

That is exactly the right question to ask right now.

Main sources

  • Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 – EUDR
  • Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1093
  • EUDR Guidance Document ON REGULATION (EU) 2023/1115 ON ZERO-DEFORESTATION PRODUCTS C/2025/4524
  • EU Regulation 2025/2650

Share: